Chef vs puppet

More companies are using configuration management tools in continuous integration strategies. Puppet , Chef , Ansible и Salt были задуманы чтобы упростить настройку и обслуживание десятков, сотен и джае тысяч серверов. Это не значит, что маленькие компании не получат выгоды от этих инструментов, так как автоматизация обычно делает жизнь проще в инфраструктуре любого . Chef based on systems and pricing, features, and integrations to help you make the right choice for your company.

All four configuration management tools are designed to reduce the complexity of configuring distributed . Puppet is an older technology than Chef and its more established roots speak well to the needs of traditional infrastructure operators.

That focus makes Puppet appealing to . While Puppet and Chef may be used in similar ways, they have different approaches. This blog helps you understand the differences between Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack and determine which among these tools suits you the best. Configuration management tools install and manage software on a machine that already exists.

Terraform is not a configuration management tool, and it allows existing tooling to focus on their strengths: bootstrapping and initializing resources. Using provisioners, Terraform enables any . You can refer the below table: To get a detailed explanation on all these metrics, you can refer this blog: Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack: Which One to Choose ? The leading configuration management and orchestration tools take different paths to server automation. Puppet is model-driven, Ruby is procedural, and both are large, messy, open source ecosystems plagued with pitfalls.

Guest As configuration management tools go, Chef and Puppet have a lot in common. Docker and Vagrant are mentione too, for similar requirements. Containers vs Hypervisors (VMs). With Vagrant you might spin up a few CentOS boxes and . CloudFormation and Terraform are “orchestration tools”, which means they are designed to . Chef , Puppet , Ansible, and SaltStack are all “configuration management” tools, which means they are designed to install and manage software on existing servers.

If your team has more experience with system administration, you may prefer Puppet. On the other han if your team is mostly developers, Chef might be a better fit. See what developers are saying about Ansible vs Chef vs Puppet Labs. Some developers prefer Ansible over Chef because. It may seem strange to compare Serf to configuration management tools, but most of them provide mechanisms to incorporate global state into the configuration of a node.

For example, Puppet provides exported resources and Chef has node searching. As an example, if you generate a config file for a load balancer to . It is not uncommon to find people using Chef , Puppet , and other configuration management tools to build service discovery mechanisms. This is usually done by querying global state to construct configuration files on each node during a periodic convergence run. Save weeks of effort with this book that compares Puppet , Chef , Salt, and Ansible so you can quickly choose which configuration management tool to use. A big part of configuring software is setting up secrets: configuring a web application to talk to a service, configuring the credentials of a database, etc.

Because of this, configuration management systems all face a problem of safely storing these secrets.

Я при выборе между puppet и chef выбрал ansible. Оно отличается тем, что а ) требуется только openssh и python. Puppet vs Chef is the heavyweight comparison of configuration software management. Chef — система управления конфигурациями, написанная на Ruby ( клиентская часть) и Erlang (серверная часть), с использованием предметно- ориентированного языка для описания конфигураций.

Используется для упрощения задач настройки и поддержки множества серверов и может интегрироваться . Chef is both the name of a company and the name of a configuration management tool written in Ruby and Erlang. It uses a pure-Ruby, domain- specific language (DSL) for writing system configuration recipes.